Page 67 - Vision & Ecstasy - Giovanni Benedetto Castiglione's St. Francis.
P. 67
seen as a continuous exploration of a single, larger theme. In
any event, the painting should be assigned to Castiglione’s last
years in Rome, 1650-51.35 Its especially complex synthesis,
relative restraint, and patient execution are certainly consistent
with that of paintings of characteristic subjects that are
convincingly dated to that same moment. Principal among these
are the Diogenes that once belonged to Carlo Maratta (Fig. 24)
and the great Bacchanal long in the possession of the Durazzo
family.36 Its most salient features, however, point to a Genoese
destination. The over-determined and locally grown naturalism,
the intense and interiorized spirituality and the practically
polemical relation to the emergent High Baroque: these would
Fig.24 G.B. CASTIGLIONE have seemed extraneous if not anachronistic and defensive in
Diogenes, The Prado,Madrid. mid-century Rome. On the other hand they would have made
great sense back in Castiglione’s native city. The etchings alone
with their conveyance of new inventions and stylistic researches back-and-forth, between Rome and Genoa,
corroborate Castiglione’s sensitivity to both audiences and their interests. It is therefore logical to infer that
the present painting was intended for a Capuchin church in Liguria. Ratti’s Descrizione… (1766) mentions
such a work at Campi, on the western edge of modern Genoa: ‘Nei Cappuccini all’altar maggiore il San
Francesco Stigmatizzato dal Castiglione’.37 Bearing in mind the frequently generic or labile identification of
subject matter in even the most detailed guides of the pre-modern era, more important taking ‘stigmatizzato’
35. Both Brigstocke 1980, p. 293, and Newcome in Warsaw 1990, pp. 255-56, date the painting in close conjunction with the
altarpiece for Osimo, to the early 1650s. Standring in La pittura 1987, p. 168, associates the painting with Castiglione’s very
latest works, 1662-63. In Genoa 1990, p. 147, he revises the dating to the‘fine degli anni Cinquanta.’ His file on the painting
comments first, ‘… Castiglione’s broad handling, his fascination with painting itself evident in the red flecks he gave to the
otherwise ruddy brown complexion, and his dramatic sue of lighting in this composition, suggest that he executed the work
later in his career, perhaps in the early 1660s.’ In a later comment added to the file, however, he offers that,‘it is likely that
Castiglione executed this work shortly after he returned to Genoa in 1651.’
36. Madrid, Museo del Prado, inv. no. P-88, andTurin, Galleria Sabauda, inv. no. 551; Genoa 1990, cat. nos.16 and 17 respectively.
37. C. G. Ratti, Descrizione delle Pitture,Scolture,e Architetture ecc.Che trovansi in alcune Città,Borghi,e Castelli Delle due Riviere dello Stato
Ligure, Genoa 1766 [ed.1780], p. 11. Standring in Genoa 1990, p. 146, introduced this passage to the discussion of the present
painting. He concluded at the time that it referred to a different painting of a more traditional Stigmatisation.
69

